JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 20, 1999

T-004 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Murcia Pe-A Rodrigo·Respondent Universidad Sur Colombia

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Der. A La Educacion. Proceso De Seleccion En Universidad. Se Aceptaron Alumnos Con Puntaje Del Icfes Inferior Al Del Actor. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acceso A La Universidad Publica
  • Cupos son bienes escasos
  • Criterio básico es el mérito académico
  • Inconstitucionalidad de privilegios para hijos de personal administrativo de universidad
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del 21 de agosto de 1998, expedida en segunda instancia por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Neiva (Huila).
  3. Segundo. TUTELAR los derechos constitucionales fundamentales a la igualdad y a la educación de William Rodrigo Murcia Mono, ordenando a la Universidad Surcolombiana de Neiva que, dentro de las 48 horas siguientes a la notificación de esta providencia, admita y expida a favor del actor, orden de matrícula para el programa de medicina a iniciarse en el mes de febrero de 1999.
  4. Tercero. LÍBRENSE por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.