C-951 de 2007
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
✓Claimant Carlos Fradique Mendez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cumplimiento de requisitos de la demanda
- Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
- Existencia de cargo
- Procedencia de su aplicación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 1098 de 2006 articulos 54 (parcial) y 55 (parcial).
Se expide el codigo de la infancia y la adolescencia.
Amonestacion.
Incumplimiento de la medida.la demandante considera que las normas acusadas son contrarias al articulo 28 de la constitucion politica.ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.
La corte encuentra que existe una marcada incongruencia entre el contenido juridico de las expresiones demandadas y el cargo de la demanda.
No existe en la demanda razones que permitan satisfacer siquiera en forma minima el criterio de suficiencia argumentativa.inhibida
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 1098/06. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE:
- Declararse inhibida para emitir un pronunciamiento de fondo en relacion con la constitucionalidad de las expresiones demandadas de los articulos 54 y 55 de la Ley 1098 de 2006, por encontrar que en este caso hay lugar a la ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.