JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 18, 1999Full bench

C-918 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Benjamin Ochoa Moreno Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec.1064/99 Art.2 Lit F) 8 Inciso 3152021 Y 22. Dec.1065/99 Art. 9 Parc. Decretos Hibridos. Atribuciones Propias Del Gobierno Y Legislativas Extraordinarias. Liquidacion Caja Agraria. Inconstitucionalidad Por Consecuencia. Ley 489/98 Deja Sin Fundamento.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Caja Agraria
  • Liquidación
Decreto Hibrido
  • Dificultad para control constitucional
  • Inexistencia
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1064/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 15Decreto 1064/99STRUCK DOWN
Art. 2Decreto 1064/99STRUCK DOWN
Art. 20Decreto 1064/99STRUCK DOWN
Art. 21Decreto 1064/99STRUCK DOWN
Art. 22Decreto 1064/99STRUCK DOWN
Art. 8Decreto 1064/99STRUCK DOWN
Art. 9Decreto 1065/99STRUCK DOWN
7 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Decláranse INEXEQUIBLES en su totalidad, a partir de la fecha de su promulgación, los decretos leyes 1064 y 1065 de 1999.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentEduardo Cifuentes MuñozDissentVladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.