JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 4, 2006Full bench

C-822 de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Santiago Alejandro Jiménez Campiño Y Otros.

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Aborto. Casos En Que No Constituye Delito
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 599 de 2000 articulos 122123 y 124.

Consideran que se desconoce la autonomia y la libertad de la mujer al no contemplar excepciones para el aborto al igual que la salud ya que no pueden acceder a un servicio medico seguro y legal al igual que la discriminación femenina como instrumento reproductivo.

Coza juzgada.

Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia <a href=../2006/c-355-06.rtf> c-355/06</a>.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 122Ley 599/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 123Ley 599/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 124Ley 599/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-355 de 2006.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceAlvaro Tafur GalvisConcurrenceNilson Pinilla Pinilla
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.