JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 29, 2000Full bench

C-805 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Becerra Hermida

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1071/99. Art. 23 Lit V) Funciones De La Dian. Exequible E Inhibitoria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Gobierno
  • Facultad para organizar entidades públicas
Aranceles Y Regimen De Aduanas
  • Regulación conjunta entre Gobierno y Congreso
Decreto Ley
  • Control de constitucionalidad
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Errónea interpretación de norma acusada
Direccion De Impuestos Y Aduanas Nacionales
  • Atribución en asuntos aduaneros
  • Fijación de precios mínimos oficiales y de referencia mediante acto administrativo
Funcionario Administrativo
  • Atribución de fijar precios mínimos y de referencia
Unificacion Normativa
  • Disposición que reitera función establecida en normas anteriores
10 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1220/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 27Decreto 1220/96DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 23Decreto 1071/99 «literal v»UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el literal v. del artículo 23 del Decreto Ley 1071 de 1999 por no exceder los límites de las facultades extraordinarias otorgadas al Presidente por el Congreso de la República.
  4. Segundo. INHIBIRSE, por falta de competencia, para conocer de la demanda contra el artículo 27 del Decreto Reglamentario 1220 de 1996.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.