JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 14, 2000Full bench

C-699 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Chavelly Blanco Henao

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad. Necesidad De Determinar El Significado De La Norma
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad
  • Juicio relacional
  • Necesidad de determinar significado de la norma
Contravencion Especial
  • Audiencia preliminar
Corte Constitucional
  • Análisis del alcance de la norma acusada
  • Improcedencia de control oficioso
  • Incompetencia para estudiar sugerencias de reforma procesal
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Contenido distinto de la norma
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 228/95.

Art. 21 (p).

Audiencia preliminar en caso de querella.

Contravenciones.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 228/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 21Ley 228/95UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresión "el funcionario competente dictará auto de apertura de proceso y fijará fecha y hora para escuchar la versión sobre los hechos" contenida en el artículo 21 parcial de la Ley 228 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.