JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 27, 2002Full bench

C-691 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jaime Antonio Guarin Torres

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Derogación De Norma Y No Efectos Jurídicos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Norma Derogada
  • Diferencias con nueva disposición
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Derogación de norma y no efectos jurídicos
Principio De Unidad Normativa En Norma Derogada
  • No configuración de reproducción de norma
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 10 de 1992.

Art. 63.

Servicio exterior.

Carrera diplomatica y consular.

Facultades extraordinarias.

Designacion personas que ocasional o permanente presten servicios especializados a misiones en el exterior.

Norma derogada.

Decreto 274 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 10/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 63Decreto 10/92DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para decidir en el fondo la demanda incoada en contra del articulo63 del Decreto 10 de 1992.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.