JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 18, 1999Full bench

C-596 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella

✓
Topic · hard data
Suspension En El Ejercicio Del Cargo O Destitucion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el artículo 12 del Decreto 1888 de 1989 “Por el cual se modifica el régimen disciplinario de los funcionarios y empleados de la rama jurisdiccional”.

El demandante consideró que, en el manejo de las inhabilidades, las disposiciones le otorgan un tratamiento benévolo a los jueces y magistrados frente al que les conceden a los abogados, cuando debía ocurrir todo lo contrario en razón de la preeminencia y responsabilidad que supone el ejercicio de su cargo.

La Corte evidenció que el decreto objeto de revisión fue derogado por la Ley 200 de 1995, en consecuencia, se declaró inhibida de resolver.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1888/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 12Decreto 1888/89DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad del artículo 12 del Decreto 1888 de 1989, por carencia actual de objeto sobre el cual decidir.
  2. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.