JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 8, 2004Full bench

C-578 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jose Alberto Gaitan Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Gas Licuado De Petroleo. Cambio Legislativo En Relación Con La Finalidad E Introducción De Restricciones
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Congreso
  • Competencia para estudiar levantamiento de prohibición sobre una actividad
Gas Licuado De Petroleo
  • Cambio legislativo en relación con la finalidad e introducción de restricciones
  • Oferta actualmente es limitada
  • Restricción de uso al doméstico salvo en vehículos para transporte de gas
  • Uso doméstico
Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Prestación a toda la población como objetivo constitucional
Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Predicable de las personas
Gas Liquido De Petroleo
  • Uso como combustible automotor
11 topics · 13 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 689 de 2001.

Art. 22.

Modifica parcial ley 142 de 1994.

Regimen de servicios publicos domiciliarios.

Autorizacion a empresas distribuidoras la utilizacion de glp para consumo interno.

Libertad economica o de empresa e iniciativa privada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 689/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 22Ley 689/01UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-087 de 2001, en relación con el cargo de unidad de materia.
  2. Segundo. Declarar exequible el artículo 22 de la 689 de 2001 "Por la cual se modifica parcialmente la Ley 142 de 1994."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.