JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 31, 2001Full bench

C-552 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Gonzalo Cuervo Rojas.

✓
Topic · hard data
Denunciante En Investigacion Previa. Derechos Y Garantías
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Investigacion Previa
  • Evaluación por Estado de procedencia
  • Finalidad
  • No constitución de parte civil
  • Inicio con sujeción a la ley
  • Objetivo
Accion Penal
  • Titularidad
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Reserva de diligencias en investigación previa
Denunciante Y Sindicado En Investigacion Previa
  • Intereses y diferencia
  • Trato diferente
Estado
  • Función primordial
11 topics · 16 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 2700 de 1991.

Arts. 319 y 321.

Codigo de procedimiento penal.

Investigacion preliminar y fines del estado.

El denunciante y sindicado frente a la investigacion preliminar.

Las decisiones que profiera la corte tienen efectos definitivos y hacen transito a cosa juzgada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2700/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 319Decreto 2700/91UPHELD
Art. 321Decreto 2700/91UPHELD
Art. 40Ley 81/93UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-1711 de diciembre doce (12) de 2000 que declaró exequible el artículo 321 del Decreto 2700 de 1991.
  2. SEGUNDO. Declárese EXEQUIBLE el artículo 319 del Código de Procedimiento Penal, modificado por el art. 40 de la Ley 81 de 1993.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.