JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 23, 1998Full bench

C-522 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Enrique Guarin Alvarez Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 114/13. Art. 4 N°3. Pension Gracia A Favor De Docentes. Pensiones Paralelas. Estarse A Lo Resuelto En La Sentencia <a Href=../1998/C-479-98.Rtf> C-479/98</A>
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 114/13. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 4Ley 114/13UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Estése a lo resuelto en Sentencia C-479 de 9 de septiembre de 1998, expediente D-1973, en la cual se declaró la exequibilidad de la expresión "que no ha recibido ni recibe actualmente otra pensión o recompensa de carácter nacional", contenida en el numeral 3º del artículo 4º de la Ley 114 de 1913 que "crea pensiones de jubilación a favor de los maestros de escuela".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.