JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 25, 2002Full bench

C-481 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓
Topic · hard data
Sentencia En Objecion Presidencial. Cumplimiento
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia En Objecion Presidencial
  • Cumplimiento
  • Cumplimiento ante error de transcripción
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Proyecto de ley 22 de 1999 senado y 06 de 2000 camara.

Regimen politico administrativo y fiscal de los distritos portuario e industrial de barraquilla turistico y culural de cartagena de indias y turistico cultural e historico de santa marta.

Mocion de observaciones y de censura

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 22/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 22/99UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR CUMPLIDA la exigencia constitucional del artículo 167 de la Carta Política, en relación con la sentencia C-063 de 2002, y por lo tanto EXEQUIBLE el proyecto de ley No. 22/99 Senado - 06/00 Cámara, "Por la cual se adopta el Régimen Político, Administrativo y Fiscal de los Distritos Portuario e Industrial de Barranquilla, Turístico y Cultural de Cartagena de Indias y Turístico, Cultural e Histórico de Santa Marta", tal y como quedó modificado por el Congreso respecto de las cuestiones analizadas.
  2. Segundo. Disponer que se remita el proyecto de ley al Presidente de la República para la correspondiente sanción.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.