JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 14, 2006Full bench

C-477 de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Roberto Rafael Bornacelli Guerrero Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Ley De Bancadas
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 974 de 2005 articulo 20 transitorio.

Se reglamenta la actuacion en bancadas de los miembros de las corporaciones publicas y se adecua el reglamento del congreso al regimen de bancadas.

Se autoriza por una sola vez para que los representantes a la camara puedan desafiliarse de los movimientos o partidos que los avalaron y se afilien a otros movimientos o partidos politicos...

Los demandantes consideran que la norma demandada desconoce los articulos 1 4 58 83 109 152 153 y 158 al igual que el preambulo y articulo 13 de la constitucion política.

Cosa juzgada formal respecto del articulo 20 de la ley 974 de 2005.

Estarse a lo resuelto en c-453 de 2006

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 974/05. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 20Ley 974/05ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-453 de 2006, en la cual se declaro inexequible el articulo transitorio 20 de la Ley 974 de 2005.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.