JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 13, 2007Full bench

C-475 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Carlos Mario Isaza Serrano

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Codigo Disciplinario
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 734 de 2002 articulo 148.

Se adopta el codigo disciplinario unico.

Atribuciones de policia judicial.el demandante considera que la norma acusada vulnera los articulos 15 28 29 121 y 122 de la constitucion.ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.

En la presente demanda se echan de menos las explicaciones juridicas concretas y pertinentes de como se produce el desconocimiento de la constitucion por parte de los incisos en cuestion.inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 734/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 148Ley 734/00DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 148Ley 734/02 «inciso 1 y 2»DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. INHIBIRSE para proferir una decision de merito respecto de los incisos
  2. primero. y
  3. segundo. del articulo 148 de la Ley 734 de 2000, "Por la cual se adopta el Codigo Disciplinario Unico".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.