JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 24, 2006Full bench

C-392 de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Diego Leon Bedoya Jaramillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Vencimiento De Terminos En Proceso Penal. Fundamento Constitucional Del Deber De Dar Aviso A Autoridad Judicial
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Prevaricato Por Omision
  • Vencimiento de términos
Vencimiento De Terminos En Proceso Penal
  • Fundamento constitucional del deber de dar aviso a autoridad judicial
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 906 de 2004 articulo 294 (parcial).

Se expide el codigo de procedimiento penal.

Vencimiento del termino.

Para el actor la norma acusada vulnera los articulos 28 y 83 de la constitucion politica.

Alcance normativo de la disposicion acusada.

Examen de constitucionalidad.

La corte encuentra que la norma demandada no vulnera lo dispuesto en las normas superiores mencionadas por el actor.

Exequible

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 906/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 294Ley 906/04 «" penal" contenida en el inciso 3.»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresión "penal" contenida en el inciso
  2. tercero. del artículo 294 de la ley 906 de 2004 -Código de Procedimiento Penal-.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.