JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 9, 1993Full bench

C-379 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Min. Rels. Exteriores

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 29/92. Protocolo De Montreal Relativo A Las Sustancias Agotadoras De La Capa De Ozono. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Relaciones Ecologicas
  • Internacionalización
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 29/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Declarar exequible el Protocolo de Montreal relativo a las sustancias agotadoras de la capa de ozono, suscrito en Montreal el 16 de septiembre de 1987, con sus enmiendas adoptadas en Londres el 29 de junio de 1990 y en Nairobi el 21 de junio 1991, asi como la ley 29 del 28 de diciembre de 1992, que lo aprueba.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comunicar a la Presidencia de la Republica y al Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, para los fines contemplados en el articulo 241, numeral 10, de la Constitucion Politica.
  3. NOTIFIQUESE,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.