JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 29, 2006Full bench

C-240 de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad De La Enmienda Del Protocolo De Montreal Relativo A Las Sustancias Que Agotan La Capa De Ozono
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Enmienda Del Protocolo De Montreal Relativo A Las Sustancias Que Agotan La Capa De Ozono
  • Objetivos
  • Principio de reciprocidad
  • Acorde con preceptos constitucionales
  • Antecedentes
  • Aprobación por el Congreso sin la suscripción del gobierno colombiano
3 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 960 de 2005.

Se aprueba la enmienda del protocolo de montreal relativo a las sustancias que agotan la capa de ozono.

Constitucionalidad en los aspectos formales.

Tramite legislativo para la expedicion de la ley 960 de 2005.

Constitucionalidad de la enmienda por su aspecto material.

Exequibles

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 960/05. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la "Enmienda del Protocolo de Montreal relativo a las sustancias que agotan la capa de ozono", adoptada en Beijing, China, el tres (3) diciembre de 1999.
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 960 del veintiocho (28) de junio de 2005, por medio de la cual se aprueba la citada Enmienda.
  3. Tercero. Ordenar la comunicacion de la presente sentencia al Presidente de la Republica y a la Ministra de Relaciones Exteriores, para los fines contemplados en el numeral 10 del articulo 241 de la Constitucion Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentAlfredo Beltrán SierraDissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.