JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 27, 2009Full bench

C-375 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Juan Pablo Barrios Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Consulta Previa De Comunidades Y Grupos Etnicos. Incumplimiento Respecto De Las Normas Que Integran El Estatuto De Desarrollo Rural
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional Absoluta
  • Reglas de configuración
  • Configuración cuando decisión de inexequibilidad se refiere a la totalidad de contenidos de la ley
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 1152 de 2007, “por medio de la cual se dicta el estatuto de desarrollo rural, se reforma el instituto colombiano de desarrollo rural incoder y se dictan otras disposiciones”. <br>en vista de que esta corporacion, mediante sentencia c-175 de este anualidad, resolvio declarar inexequible la totalidad de la ley demandada, en este oportunidad se dispuso estarse a lo resuelto en tal sentencia. <br>

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 1152/07. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 1152/07ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-175 de marzo 18 de 2009, mediante la cual fue declarada inexequible la Ley 1152 de 2007.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.