C-356 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Erika Militza Cure Vergara
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Disposiciones aplicables en contratos de concesión del servicio de televisión por suscripción
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 680 de 2001.
Art. 6 (p.).
Reforma ley 14 de 1991 ley 182 de 1995 y ley 335 de 1996.
Comision nacional de television.
Contratos con operadores privados concesionarios de espacios de canales de operación publica y concesion del servicio publico de television
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 680/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- R E S U E L V E
- Estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia C-351 de 2004, que decidio declarar inexequible la expresion acusada del inciso final del paragrafo del articulo 6deg de la Ley 680 de 2001, "por la cual se reforman las leyes 14 de 1991, 182 de 1995, 335 de 1996 y se dictan otras disposiciones en materia de television".
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.