C-324 de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
✓Claimant Gustavo Morales Cobo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Acusación fundamentada en artículo declarado inexequible
- Configuración
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 901 de 2004 articulo 2 paragrafo 3.
Boletin de deudores morosos de entidades estatales y publicacion por la contaduria general de la nacion.
El demandante considera que la norma acusada quebranta los articulo 15 16 25 29 44 y 333 de la constitucion.
Alcance de la cosa juzgada constitucional derivada de las sentencias <a href=../2005/c-153-05.rtf> c-153/05</a><a href=../2005/c-877-05y.rtf> c-877/05</a><a href=../2005/c-1083-05.rtf> c-1083/05</a>.
Necesidad de emitir un fallo inhibitorio.
A pesar de que no existe cosa juzgada respecto de algunos incisos del paragrafo demandado en relacion con el cargo formulado por el actor esta corporacion encuentra que dicho cargo ha perdido su fundamento logico.
Estarse a lo resuelto en c-1083 de 2005 e inhibida
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 901/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (6 points)
- PRIMERO. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-1083 de 2005, en la que se declaro la inexequibilidad de los incisos
- segundo. y
- cuarto. del paragrafo 3deg del articulo 2deg de la Ley 901 de 2004.
- SEGUNDO. INHIBIRSE de efectuar un pronunciamiento de fondo respeto de los incisos primero,
- tercero. y
- quinto. del paragrafo 3deg del articulo 2deg de la Ley 901 de 2004, por las razones expuestas en la presente sentencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.