JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 24, 2002Full bench

C-297 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Marcela Patricia Jimenez Arango

✓
Topic · hard data
Medidas De Aseguramiento En Inimputable. Límite Temporal Máximo Por Delito Que No Contemple Pena Privativa De La Libertad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Imputable E Inimputable
  • Regulación diferenciada de extinción de la acción penal no es en sí misma discriminatoria
  • Diferencia de regímenes
  • Distinción
Medidas De Seguridad
  • Fijación de términos mínimos de duración de internamiento vulnera la Constitución
  • Sujeción a garantías propias del derecho penal
  • Imposición de términos mínimos transforma en castigo retributivo incompatible con los inimputables
Pena Y Medidas De Seguridad
  • Distinción
  • Diferencias profundas
  • Similitudes y diferencias
Medidas De Seguridad En Inimputable
  • Límite temporal máximo por delito que no contemple pena privativa de la libertad
6 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 599 de 2000.

Art. 76.

Codigo penal.

Medida de aseguramiento en casos especiales.

Inimputabilidad.

Penas y medidas de seguridad.

Intencion subjetiva al momento de cometer el delito.

Trato discriminatorio.

Beneficios.

Extincion de la accion penal.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 76Ley 599/00UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 76 de la Ley 599 de 2000 (Código Penal)
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.