JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 8, 2000Full bench

C-288 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓
Topic · hard data
Acuerdo De Planificacion De Asentamientos Humanos En Los Pasos De Frontera Entre Colombia Y Ecuador
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acuerdo De Planificacion De Asentamientos Humanos En Los Pasos De Frontera Con La Republica De Ecuador
  • Suscripción y trámite
  • Comité Técnico Binacional
  • Finalidad y contenido general
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 521/99.

Acuerdo de planificacion de asentamientos humanos en los pasos de frontera entre colombia y ecuador.

Exequibles.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 521/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el "Acuerdo de Planificación de Asentamientos Humanos en los Pasos de Frontera entre la República de Colombia y el Gobierno del Ecuador" firmado en Santafé de Bogotá, D.C., el diecisiete (17) de diciembre de 1996 y la Ley Nº 521 del 4 de agosto de 1999, por medio de la cual se aprueba dicho Acuerdo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.