JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 27, 1996Full bench

C-285 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Hugo Palacios Mejia

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 624/89. Arts 1 Y 665. Estatuto Tributario. Responsabilidad Penal Por No Consignar Las Retenciones. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • En función de interpretación no puede integrar normas
Estatuto Tributario
  • Alteración del contenido de las normas
Congreso
  • Conveniencia de expedición de normas
7 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 624/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 665Decreto 624/89STRUCK DOWN
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Declarar inexequible el artículo 665 del Estatuto Tributario -Decreto 624 de 1989-, convertido en norma legal por el artículo 1o. del mismo ordenamiento.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.