JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 29, 1997Full bench

C-218 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 316/96. Por La Cual Se Aprueba El Protocolo Interpretativo Del Art. 44 Del Tratado De Montevideo 1980. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 316/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 44Ley 316/96UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declaranse EXEQUIBLES el "Protocolo interpretativo del articulo 44 del Tratado de Montevideo de 1980", hecho en la ciudad de Cartagena de Indias el 13 de junio de 1994, y la Ley 316 del 13 de septiembre de 1996, que lo aprueba.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.