JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 28, 1994Full bench

C-211 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Julio Roberto Nieto

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 35/93. Arts 25 Y 27 Parciales 29 Y 30. Dec 663/93. Arts 304 Y 306 Parciales 308 Y 309. Cosa Juzgada. Estarse A Lo Resuelto En La <a Href=../1994/C-037-94.Rtf> C-037/94</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 35/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 25Ley 35/93 «inciso 3»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 27Ley 35/93 «inciso 3»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 29Ley 35/93DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 30Ley 35/93DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 304Decreto 663/93 «inciso 3»UPHELD
Art. 306Decreto 663/93UPHELD
Art. 308Decreto 663/93UPHELD
Art. 309Decreto 663/93UPHELD
8 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLES el inciso
  4. tercero. del artículo 304, y los artículos 308 y 309 del decreto 663 de 1993.
  5. SEGUNDO. En relación con el inciso
  6. tercero. del artículo 306 del decreto 663 de 1993, estar a lo resuelto en la sentencia No. C-037 del 3 de febrero de 1994.
  7. TERCERO. Inhibirse de emitir pronunciamiento de fondo sobre los artículos 25 inciso 3o, 27 inciso 3o., 29 y 30 de la ley 35 de 1993, por carencia actual de objeto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.