JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 17, 1997Full bench

C-195 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carmenza Isaza de Goméz

✓Claimant Luis Enrique Olivera Petro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 14/83. Art. 38. Por La Cual Se Fortalecen Los Fiscos De Entidades Territoriales. Exenciones De Impuestos Municipales. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Exencion De Impuesto Municipal
  • Tiempo durante el cual debe regir
  • Ley no puede concederla
  • Tiempo determinado
Exencion Tributaria
  • Mecanismo a disposición de los concejos
Tributo Y Gasto Local
  • Exenciones de impuestos municipales con límite de tiempo
  • Restricción
Autonomia De Entidades Territoriales
  • Límites constitucionales y legales
  • Presunción de inconstitucionalidad normas anteriores a la Constitución
Autonomia Municipal
  • Regulación régimen del tributo
Centralizacion Politica Y Descentralizacion Administrativa
  • Regulación vigente está dada por autonomía territorial
Impuesto Municipal
  • Decreto excepcional por legislador
Municipio
  • Facultad de establecer exenciones por lapso de tiempo
  • Puede decretar exenciones de los propios impuestos
11 topics · 16 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 14/83. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 38Ley 14/83UPHELD
Art. 258Decreto 1333/86UPHELD
Art. 258Decreto 1333/86UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el artículo 38 de la ley 14 de 1983, subrogado por el 258 del decreto ley 1333 de 1986, que lo reproduce, y que por las mismas razones se declara exequible.
  2. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.