JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 8, 1996Full bench

C-186 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 195/95. Convenio Para Prevenir Y Sancionar Los Actos De Terrorismo En Delitos Contra Las Personas Y La Extorsion. Extradicion. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Autonomia Juridica Del Estado
  • Calificación de los delitos
Extradicion De Nacionales
  • Impedimento constitucional
Extradicion
  • Naturaleza
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 195/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLES "El convenio para prevenir y sancionar los actos de terrorismo configurados en delitos contra las personas y la extorsión conexa cuando estos tengan trascendencia internacional", suscrito en Nueva York, el 2 de febrero de 1971, y la ley 195 de 1995, aprobatoria de dicho Convenio, por las consideraciones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoConcurrenceVladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.