JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 11, 2009Full bench

C-151 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Leonardo Cuadrado Arevalo

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Derecho De Defensa En Audiencia De Control O Revision De Legalidad En Sistema Penal Acusatorio
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 906 de 2004, articulo 237.el actor demanda la inconstitucionalidad de la formulacion “durante el tramite de la audiencia solo podran asistir, ademas del fiscal, los funcionarios de la policia judicial y los testigos o peritos que prestaron declaraciones juradas con el fin de obtener la orden respectiva, o que intervinieron en la diligencia”, por estimar que esta vulnera los articulos 2, 13, 29 y 229 de la constitucion asi como el articulo 14 del pidcp y 8 de la cadh. <br>en vista de que en sentencia c-025 de 2009, la corte se pronuncio sobre la constitucionalidad de la expresion acusada, se declaro la configuracion del fenomeno de la cosa juzgada. <br>estarse a lo resuelto c-025 de 2009. <br>

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 906/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 237Ley 906/04ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en sentencia C- 025 de 2009.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.