JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 8, 2000Full bench

C-1505 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Ernesto Rey Cantor

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 261 De 2000. Art. 54. Modifica La Estructura De La Fiscalia General De La Nacion. Requisitos O Calidades Para El Nombramiento Del Director General Del Instituto De Medicina Legal. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Instituto De Medicina Legal Y Ciencias Forenses
  • Adscripción
  • Creación por artículo transitorio de la Constitución
  • Naturaleza jurídica
  • Regulación legal
  • Modificaciones por ley ordinaria
  • Nombramiento de Director General
  • Requisitos para Director General
Administracion De Justicia
  • Regulación ordinaria o estatutaria
Establecimiento Publico
  • Control
  • Creación legal
  • Nombramiento de directores por Presidente de la República
  • Regulación legal ante creación por artículo transitorio de la Constitución
Facultades Extraordinarias
  • Fijación de requisitos para ocupar cargos
Presidente De La Republica
  • Nombramiento de directores de establecimientos públicos
5 topics · 14 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 261/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 54Decreto 261/00UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declárase EXEQUIBLE, en su integridad, el artículo 54 del Decreto 261 de 2000, incluido su parágrafo.
  2. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.