JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 19, 1997Full bench

C-137 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 252/97. Por El Cual Se Modifica Y Adiciona El Dec. 165/97 Y Se Dictan Otras Disposiciones. Emergencia . Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inconstitucionalidad Por Consecuencia En Declaracion De Emergencia
  • Modificación y adición de decreto en reducción gasto público
Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Conmocion Interior
  • Pérdida de vigencia de decretos expedidos
  • Sentencia inhibitoria sobre decretos expedidos
Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Emergencia
  • Decisión inhibitoria sobre decretos legislativos posteriores
  • Producción efectos fallos de decretos legislativos
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 252/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 252/97STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionDecreto 080/97STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionDecreto 165/97STRUCK DOWN
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el Decreto Legislativo No. 252 del 4 de febrero de 1997 "por el cual se modifica y adiciona el Decreto Legislativo No. 165 de 1997 y se dictan otras disposiciones.".
  4. Segundo. Esta providencia surte efectos a partir del día siguiente a la notificación de la Sentencia C-122 de 1997, por medio de la cual se declaró INEXEQUIBLE el Decreto 080 de 1997.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoDissentCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.