JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 23, 1995Full bench

C-130 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓
Topic · hard data
R.E. Tratado De Cooperacion Y Amistad Y Acuerdo Economico. Ley N° 150/94. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 150/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución Nacional,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los siguientes Instrumentos Internacionales: - "Tratado General de Cooperación y Amistad entre la República de Colombia y el Reino de España", -"Acuerdo Económico entre la República de Colombia y el Reino de España, integrante del Tratado General de Cooperación y Amistad", - "Protocolo de Cooperación Técnica y Científico-Tecnológica entre la República de Colombia y el Reino de España, integrante del Tratado General de Cooperación y Amistad" y - "Protocolo de Cooperación Educativa y Cultural entre la República de Colombia y el Reino de España, integrante del Tratado General de Cooperación y Amistad", suscritos en Madrid el 29 de octubre de 1992.
  4. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la ley No. 150 del 15 de julio de 1994, aprobatoria de los Convenios antes enunciados.
  5. TERCERO. Envíar copia de la presente sentencia al Presidente de la República y al Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores, para los fines contemplados en el artículo 241-10 de la Constitución.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.