JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 22, 2005Full bench

C-1191 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Guiselle Nayibe Holguin Galvis Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Reconocimiento Y Examen Fisico De Lesionado O Victima De Agresion Sexual.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 906 de 2004 articulos 249 y 250.

Se expide el codigo de procedimiento penal.

Obtención de muestras que involucren al imputado.

Procedimiento en caso de lesionados o victimas de agresiones sexuales.

Para los demandantes el aparte demandado infringe el principio de la dignidad humana y los derechos a la no autoincriminacion y a la presunción de inocencia consagrados constitucionalmente.

Existencia de cosa juzgada.

Del análisis de los cargos expuestos se llega a la conclusión de la identidad de los argumentos esgrimidos por los demandantes.

Estarse a lo resuelto en c-822/05

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 906/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 249Ley 906/04ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-822 de 2005, que declaró la exequibilidad de los artículos 249 y 250 de la Ley 906 de 2004, salvo la expresión "para que fije los condicionamientos dentro de los cuales debe efectuarse la inspección" contenida en este último, la cual se declaró inexequible.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.