JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 6, 2000Full bench

C-1159 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Proyecto De Ley Estatutaria No.107 De 1999 Camara - 189 De 1999 Senado. Modifica La Ley 130 De 1994. Art.10. Estatuto Basico De Los Partidos Y Movimientos Politicos Se Dictan Normas Sobre Su Financiacion Y La De Campañas Electorales. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Consultas Internas
  • Reglamentación aspectos técnicos
  • Cargos del Gobierno central y territorial
  • Obligatoriedad
  • Oportunidad para su realización
  • Organización interna de partidos y movimientos políticos con personería jurídica
  • Reforma estatutos de partidos y movimientos políticos con personería jurídica
Consejo Nacional Electoral
  • Fijación de fecha para realización consultas internas
Partidos Y Movimientos Politicos
  • Democratización por consultas
5 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 130/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el proyecto de ley estatutaria No. 107/99 Camara - 189/99 Senado "por la cual se modifica el articulo 10 de la Ley 130 de 1994."
  4. Segundo. Enviar copia de este fallo al Presidente del Senado de la Republica, al Presidente de la Camara de Representantes y al Presidente de la Republica, para los efectos pertinentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.