JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 30, 2000Full bench

C-1142 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Ariza Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 410 De 1971. Art.90. Codigo De Comercio. Inhabilidades De Abogados Economistas Y Contadores Que Reciben Remuneracion Como Empleados De Las Camaras De Comercio Para Ejercer Su Profesion. Exequible Salvo Expresiones Y Frases.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Camara De Comercio
  • Facultad para sancionar empleados
  • Naturaleza
  • Inhabilidades para abogados, economistas y contadores
Funcion Publica Por Particulares
  • Regulación legal
  • Inhabilidades
Legislador
  • Incompatibilidades para ejercicio de función pública
Incompatibilidades En Cargos De Camara De Comercio
  • Distinción discriminatoria entre empleados permanentes y transitorios
  • Deben extenderse a todas las profesiones
6 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 410/71. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 90Decreto 410/71 «abogados, economistas y contadores" y "permanentes", y las frases "y multa hasta de veinte mil pesos" y "Una y otra las decretará el Superintendente de Industria y Comercio»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 90 del Codigo de Comercio, salvo las expresiones "abogados, economistas y contadores" y "permanentes", y las frases "y multa hasta de veinte mil pesos" y "Una y otra las decretara el Superintendente de Industria y Comercio", todas las cuales se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.