JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 5, 2002Full bench

C-1078 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Luis Eduardo Forero Medina

✓
Topic · hard data
Habilitacion O Permiso En Servicio Publico De Transporte. Alcance Del Carácter Intransferible
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Autorizacion Administrativa En El Estado Social De Derecho
  • Ampliación de ámbito
  • Extensión al campo de la actividad económica
Autorizacion Administrativa
  • Establecimiento por ley
  • Límites
  • No es derecho adquirido
  • Significado
  • Tipología
Habilitacion O Permiso En Servicio Publico De Transporte
  • Carácter intransferible
  • No revocación sin justa causa o indemnización
  • Transferencia de empresa
  • Alcance del carácter intransferible
Servicio Publico De Transporte
  • Reglamentación de condiciones
  • Prestación
Permiso En Servicio Publico De Transporte
  • Carácter intransferible
  • Empresario como persona natural o jurídica
10 topics · 19 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 336 de 1996.

Arts. 13 18 (p.) y 60 (p.).

Estatuto nacional de transporte.

Habilitacion intransferible a cualquier titulo.

Intuito personae.

Cesion de operaciones.

Permiso para prestar servicio publico.

Autorizaciones administrativas.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2067/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 16Decreto 2067/91UPHELD
Art. 18Decreto 2067/91UPHELD
Art. 13Ley 336/96UPHELD
Art. 18Ley 336/96UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar la EXEQUIBILIDAD del articulo 13 de la Ley 336 de 1996 y de la expresion "e intransferible" contenida en el articulo 18 de la misma ley, en relacion con los cargos analizados en la parte motiva de esta Sentencia.
  2. De conformidad con lo dispuesto en los articulos 16 y 18 del Decreto 2067 de 1991,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.