JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 10, 2001Full bench

C-1068 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Marcela Adriana Rodriguez Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Pena En Codigo Penal Y Codigo Penal Militar. Metodologías Distintas En Individualización
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pena En Codigo Penal Y Codigo Penal Militar
  • Universos distintos en fundamentos para la individualización
  • Metodologías distintas en individualización
  • Sistemas de graduación
Codigo Penal Militar
  • Régimen completo y diferente al ordinario
  • Regulación especial
Jurisdiccion Penal Militar
  • Régimen excepcional
Justicia Penal Militar
  • Factores que delimitan la competencia
Pena
  • Metodología distinta en individualización
6 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 599 de 2000.

Art. 61.

Codigo penal.

Fundamentos para la individualizacion de la pena.

Graduacion.

Aplicación de minimos y maximos.

Codigo penal militar.

Derecho a la igualdad.

Trato diferencial.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 61Ley 599/00UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion, oido el concepto del Procurador General de la Nacion y surtidos los tramites que ordena el Decreto 2067 de 1991,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarase la EXEQUIBILIDAD del articulo 61 de la Ley 599 de 2000, en relacion con el cargo analizado en esta providencia.
  4. De conformidad con lo dispuesto en los articulos 16 y 18 del Decreto 2067 de 1991,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.