JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 28, 2003Full bench

C-1003 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant William Rene Parra Gutierrez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 2400 de 1968.

Art. 26 (p.).

Administracion de personal civil.

Declaracion de insubsistencia de nombramiento a persona que no pertenezca a carrera sin motivar providencia.

Retiro o remocion de funcionarios.

Necesidad motivacion de actos discrecionales

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2400/68. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 26Decreto 2400/68ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. 1. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en sentencia C-734 de 2000, mediante la cual se declaró la exequibilidad del artículo 26 del decreto ley 2400 de 1968.
  2. 2.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.