JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 2, 2000Full bench

C-089 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Gabriel Mora Restrepo

✓
Topic · hard data
Fuerzas Militares. Pertenencia A Una Especialidad Para Desempeño De Altos Cargos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Congreso
  • Ejercicio de funciones públicas
Facultades Extraordinarias
  • Requisitos para acceder a ciertos cargos
Test De Igualdad
  • Aplicación
  • Factor de diferenciación que no permite homologación o identidad total
  • Oficiales con funciones militares de las atribuidas a los cuerpos logísticos y administrativos
Fuerzas Militares
  • Escalafón militar
  • Pertenencia a una especialidad para desempeño de altos cargos
  • Régimen especial de carrera y jerarquía militar
  • Restricciones para el ejercicio de algunos cargos de mando
Legislador
  • Margen de discrecionalidad para fijación de requisitos para ejercicio de cargos públicos
Principio De Igualdad
  • Distinciones legítimas
6 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Dec 1211/90.

Art 60.

Restricciones para el ejercicio de algunos cargos de mando en las fuerzas militares.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1211/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 60Decreto 1211/90UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 60 del decreto 1211 de 1990, pero únicamente por los cargos analizados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.