C-073 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Josefa Briceño Pedraza
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Objeto sobre el cual versa la acusación
- Ausencia de cargo de inconstitucionalidad
- Falta de indicación precisa de norma legal que desconoce la Constitución
- Ausencia de indicación precisa de norma legal que desconoce la Constitución
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 443 de 1998.
Art. 37 (p.).
Ley 797 de 2003.
Art. 9 (p.).
Modifica ley 100 de 1993.
Art. 33.
Decreto 1572 de 1998.
Art. 133 (p.).
Causal retiro del servicio de empleados de carrera administrativa.
Sistema general de pensiones.
Regimenes especiales
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- R E S U E L V E
- Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad de los articulos 37 (parcial) de la Ley 443 del 11 de junio de 1998 y 9deg (parcial) de la Ley 797 del 29 de enero de 2003, por ineptitud sustantiva de los cargos formulados.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.