JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 20, 2004Full bench

C-021 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Pablo Emilio Cardenas Gonzalez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Medidas Por Incumplimiento De Cancelación De Multa En Infracción De Tránsito
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Medidas por incumplimiento de cancelación de multa en infracción de tránsito
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 769 de 2002.

Art. 140 (p.).

Codigo nacional de transito terrestre.

Cobro coactivo de multas por infracciones.

Inmovilizacion del vehiculo.

Retencion licencia de conduccion.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese a la sentencia c-799-03

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 769/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 140Ley 769/02ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-799 de 2003, en la cual se declaró inexequible la expresión "En todo caso será procedente la inmovilización del vehículo o preferiblemente la retención de la licencia de conducción si pasados treinta (30) días de la imposición de la multa, ésta no ha sido debidamente cancelada" contenida en el artículo 140 de la Ley 769 de 2002."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.