JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 20, 2004Full bench

C-013 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Ernesto Rey Cantor

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Fiscal General De La Nacion. Función Especial De Asunción Directa De Investigaciones Y Procesos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Funciones especiales del Fiscal General de la Nación
Fiscal General De La Nacion
  • Función especial de asunción directa de investigaciones y procesos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Acto legislativo 03 de 2002.

Art. 3 (p.).

Reforma constitucion politica.

Art. 3.

Funciones especiales del fiscal general de la nacion.

Asumir investigaciones y procesos en el estado en que se encuentren.

Autonomia de fiscales delegados.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Acto_legislativo 03/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 03/02ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 03/02ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. En cuanto al numeral demandado, ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia 1092 de 2003 que decidio "declarar EXEQUIBLE el numeral 3 del articulo 251 de la Constitucion Politica por la cargo analizado en la parte motiva de esta providencia - articulo 3 del Acto Legislativo 03 de 2002".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceMarco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.