JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 23, 2002Full bench

C-013 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Leonardo Cañon Ortegon

✓
Topic · hard data
Pension En Sistema General De Riesgos Profesionales. Inicio De Acciones Por Responsabilidad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pension En Sistema General De Riesgos Profesionales
  • Inicio de acciones por responsabilidad
Decreto
  • Determinación de naturaleza
Pension Por Accidente De Trabajo O Enfermedad Profesional
  • Competencia legislativa para fijación de límites máximos
Pensiones Legales
  • Distinción originada por enfermedad profesional y cumplimiento de requisitos de tiempo de servicio y edad
  • Facultad legislativa de fijación de límites máximos y mínimos
Pensiones
  • Límite máximo
7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1295 de 1994.

Art. 51 (p.).

Organizacion y administracion del sistema general de riesgos profesionales.

Monto de las pensiones por accidente de trabajo o enfermedad profesional.

Competencia del legislador para fijar el limite maximo.

Trato discriminatorio

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1295/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 51Decreto 1295/94UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. Declarar exequible la expresión demandada del artículo 51 del Decreto 1295 de 1994, "Por el cual se determina la organización y administración del Sistema General de Riesgos Profesionales", por no violar el artículo 13 de la Constitución.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.