JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 20, 1999Full bench

C-003 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Julian Zuluaga Mejia

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2591/91. Art. 35 Parcial. Decisiones De Revision De Tutela. Breve Justificacion. Sentencia Inhibitoria Por Inepta Demanda.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Fallo inhibitorio por ineptitud sustantiva
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2591/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 35Decreto 2591/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 35Decreto 2591/91DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA, por las razones expuestas, para decidir en relación con la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada contra el artículo 35, parcial, del Decreto Ley 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 3cited by 8 →C-003/99C-447/97 — Dec. 1228/95. Art. 11 Parcial. Federaciones Deportivas. Demanda Materialmente Inepta. Sentencia Inhibitoria. · cited 639 timesC-447/971997C-236/97 — Ley 300/96. Arts. 6 Y 44 Parcial. Corporacion Nacional De Turismo. Sentencia Inhibitoria Por Inepta Demanada. · cited 208 timesC-236/971997C-018/93 — Dec. 2591/91. Tutela No Procede Contra Sentencias. Inexequibles Unos Y Exequibles Otros · cited 142 timesC-018/931993C-047/01 — Clausula General De Competencia Legislativa. Término Para Solicitud De Ayuda Humanitaria · cited 77 timesC-047/012001C-328/01 — Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma De La Ley 113 De 1985 · cited 51 timesC-328/012001C-523/05 — Decreto Estatutario Sobre Financiacion De Campañas Electorales En El Ambito Departamental Y Municipal. Control De Límites Temporales En Su E · cited 47 timesC-523/052005A. 220/01 — Nulidad Por Temeridad Del Accionante. · cited 27 timesA. 220/012001C-007/01 — Nulidad De Matrimonio. Efectos Penales Del Secuestro Y Civiles Del Viciado · cited 25 timesC-007/012001C-1546/00 — Decreto 261 De 2000. Arts. 9 17 Y 39 (Ps.) Y 107. Modificacion Estructura De La Fiscalia General De La Nacion. Ineptitud De Demanda. Faculta · cited 19 timesC-1546/002000T-673/12 · cited 10 timesT-673/122012A. 149/05 — Solicitudes De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-523 De 2005. Carácter Excepcional De La Nulidad De Las Sentencias Proferidas Por La Corte Constituc · cited 6 timesA. 149/052005
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.