JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 1, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Pedro Julian Cufiño Lopez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se solicitó aclarar o adicionar la Sentencia T-171/16, en el sentido de indicar que se autoriza el servicio integral de transporte, no sólo para la hemodiálisis que requiere el accionante, sino para todos los demás desplazamientos que tenga que realizar para atender sus citas médicas, exámenes, laboratorios y radiografías.

Por no cumplir los presupuestos requeridos para estudiar la viabilidad de aclaración o adición de providencias proferidas por la Corporación, la Sala decide declarar IMPROCEDENTE la petición formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Declarar IMPROCEDENTE la solicitud de aclaracion elevada por el ciudadano Pedro Julian Cufino, quien actua como agente oficioso de Marco Antonio Cufino, relativa a la orden cuarta de la sentencia T-171 de 2016 emitida por la Sala Novena de Revision Constitucional.
  2. Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.