JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 29, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Omar Albeiro Rodriguez Galvez

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Aclaracion Sentencias C-177/93 Y 964/99.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud de aclaración de las Sentencias C-177/93 y C-964/99, toda vez que de conformidad con lo previsto en el Art. 241 de la Carta, la Corte Constitucional no tiene asignada la función de órgano consultivo.

Por consiguiente, no está dentro de su competencia la de absolver consultas o aclaraciones que se originen en la interpretación y cumplimiento de sus fallos.

Además, es preciso señalar que está vedado a la Corte pronunciarse nuevamente sobre un asunto decidido en una providencia anterior y donde ha operado el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENIEGASE la solicitud de aclaracion de las Sentencias C-177 de 1993 y C-964 de 1999.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al interesado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.