JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 11, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Hector Fabio Carmona Toro Vs. Juzgado Primero De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad Y La Sala Penal Del Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Pereira

✓
Topic · hard data
Se Corrige Un Error En La Sentencia T-091/06, Producido En La Transcripcion Parcial Del Articulo 367 Inciso 2 Del Codigo De Procedimiento Penal (Ley 906 De 2004) En Que Se Señalo Que El Allanamiento Producido Al Inicio Del Juicio Oral, Origina Un Descuento De "la Tercera Parte" De La Pena, Cuando La Norma Establece Para Esta Fase La Rebaja De "una Sexta Parte" De La Pena
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. CORREGIR la expresion "la tercera parte" contenida en la pagina 24 ordinal (iii), linea 17, de la sentencia T-091 de 2006, a fin de que se consigne la expresion "una sexta parte" conforme al contenido del inciso 2deg del articulo 367 de la Ley 906 de 2004.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela