JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 12, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Jorge Humberto Valero Rodríguez

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Del 15 De Septiembre De 2004 Que Rechazo La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Numeral 5º, Numeral 111.2 Articulo 111 De La Ley 715 De 2001. Confirma Auto De Rechazo Suplicado.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se confirmó el auto suplicado por el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el numeral 5º, numeral 111.2, Art. 111 de la Ley 715 de 2001.

La Corte explicó que no se configuró en este caso Cosa Juzgada Relativa sino Absoluta y por lo tanto ante la ausencia de argumentos constitucionales que controviertan las razones expuestas por el Magistrado Sustanciador del auto que se recurre, éste habrá de confirmarse.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto suplicado, por el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por el ciudadano Jorge Humberto Valero Rodríguez contra el numeral 5º, numeral 111.2, artículo 111 de la Ley 715 de 2001.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.