JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 28, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Karin Irina Kuhfeld Salazar

✓
Topic · hard data
Correccion De La Parte Resolutiva De La Sentencia C-239 De 2005, Indicando Que En Lo Sucesivo, El Numeral Primero De Dicha Parte Resolutiva Quedara Así: "estese A Lo Resuelto En La Sentencia C-194 De 2005, Respecto De La Vulneración De Los Articulos 13 Y 28 De La Constitucion De 1991"
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Corregir la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-239 de 2005 (Expediente D-5390), indicando que en lo sucesivo, el NUMERAL
  2. PRIMERO. de dicha parte resolutiva quedará así:
  3. ESTÉSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-194 de 2005, respecto de la vulneración de los artículos 13 y 28 de la Constitución de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela