JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 3, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Gilberto Garcia Cardenas

✓
Topic · hard data
Aclaracion Sentencia C-789/02
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia de aclaración
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente la solicitud elevada por el ciudadano de la referencia, mediante la cual solicitan aclaración de la Sentencia C-789/02, toda vez que de conformidad con el Art. 49 del Decreto 2067 de 1991, y la abundante jurisprudencia de esta Corporación, han coincidido en señalar que en contra de las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional no procede recurso alguno, como tampoco las aclaraciones, ampliaciones, adiciones o revisiones de sus fallos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud elevada por el ciudadano Gilberto García Cardenas, mediante la cual pretenden que la Corte Constitucional aclare la Sentencia C-789 de 2002.
  3. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.