A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero
✓Claimant Jorge Arturo Plazas Fajardo Y Otra
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia excepcional
- Causales
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
No se decretó la nulidad solicitada contra la Sentencia T-838/00, toda vez que las reales o presuntas nulidades tienen que referirse a hechos contundentes de violación al debido proceso que impliquen colocar a una persona en indefensión, o haberse cambiado jurisprudencia por una Sala de Revisión, cuando en esta circunstancia la competencia le correspondería a la sala Plena de la Corporación.
Frente al caso de estudio la Corte consideró que no ha habido cambio de jurisprudencia, que sería la única razón para decretar la presunta nulidad.
Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- NO DECRETAR la nulidad solicitada.
- Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.